I've tried to research Medical Journals on the above minimal access surgeries for isolated aortic valve replacement.
We've been to 3 local surgeons at different hospitals each with a different recommendation on type of surgery.
We are opting for a minimal access procedure vs. full sternotomy since no artery blockage at this time.
We've been told of differing levels of risk and pain which favors the surgeon's choice of surgery. Who do you believe?!
Only 3 of the top 10 leading heart hospitals per US News offer mini thoracatomy though it's been done on dogs for many years. Is it because the US is lagging again? Is it because the other surgeons lack specialized training or adeptness to do this type of surgery?
I only found email for John Hopkins surgeons but no reply yet. Cleveland Clinic offers a nurse hotline. Mayo wants you to setup an out of town appointment and visit. University of Maryland hospital nurse emailed me back that they recommend the min-thoracatomy to patients fitting my mom's profile but they aren't in the top notch hospitals.
My mom is 78 years old, frail and small is size. She has no other comorbidity illnesses like diabetes or trouble breathing.
From a commonsense standpoint, it seems like the mini thoracatomy is the approach to use as no bone (sternum) has to heal first. But we've been told by 2 of the surgeons that removal of costal cartilages between ribs is more painful.
The office staff thinks I'm nuts asking for cross clamp and bypass times for these types of surgeries but I don't know how else to evaluate it objectively. They are recommending I come in for a second appt to get this information.
I've asked the typical risk percentages and volume of surgeries each one's done and they seem comparable.
The mini thoracatomy is offered at a smaller local community hospital. The major teaching hospital doesn't offer this type of surgery...only a mini sternotomy and daVinci robotics (which is limited to the mitral valve right now). Surgical expertise appears to be comparable so the only variable is the reputation of the hospital and type of minimal access surgery offered.
If anyone has any other ideas, questions or experience, please respond!
My mom is happy to just settle with the surgeon with the best bedside manner which is the mini thoracatomy. Maybe she has a point...better peace of mind when other objective data can't be obtained easily but I think it is from my dad giving her "his" opinion. For some reason, he doesn't want to use the major teaching hospital himself. He is once again forcing his opinion on my mother.
I'm so overwhelmed and confused right now, I can't make up my mind either. I like making decisions based on facts and it's not easy to get. Do I persist to get my mom objective facts or just accept her method of deciding. My role is to be an advocate to help her make an "informed" decision and I feel like I've failed her.
The medical community not used to having to provide this type of information to patients. They expect the patient to just pick a hospital vs. a surgeon. It sucks and I'm near exhaustion even before the surgery. An older sibling chooses not be become involved yet I know she will be the first one to point a finger at me if something bad happens.
KK




Add to the discussion