After an MRI revealed a tumor on my L5 (spinal cord) I immediately had it removed which was about a month ago. My surgeon was convinced that by the looks of the tumor that it was cancer but said we had to wait for pathology. After being sent to three different pathologist they determined that it was a hemangioblastoma (benign). When I met with my surgeon he basically told me that he was going to refer me to an oncologist because I would need to be screened periodically. He mentioned that my kidneys and other organs should be screened and that the oncologist would be who I would follow up with and that he would only continue to monitor my brain and spinal cord. He really wouldn't go into too much detail because he said although a neurologist, he is essentially only an active surgeon at this point. However, I still wanted his opinion and asked if whatever is going on with me could effect my life span. He said other than the fact that yes you always take a risk when multiple surgeries are needed, etc, etc, that for the most part this would just effect my quality of life. Because he had mentioned that the tumor could come back and not just in the original spot but in others, I asked if he suspected that it could be VHL. He said that he wasn't knowledgeable or up to date enough on the disease to give an opinion. But that of course its a possibility and something the oncologist would follow up with as far as ordering testing.
The oncologist I saw is the chief of oncology so I felt confident seeing him. That feeling soon disappeared after arriving. The doctor whom was sent in first, who was not the referred doctor, started to speak of the cancer I had. I immediately stopped her and told her that I didn't have cancer. I thought for sure she had just miss spoke, however she was adamant that the tumor was malignant. I convinced her that she needed to call pathology and double check. When she returned she was joined by 3 other doctors. The chief oncologist immediately told me that I had a benign tumor however no one ever mentioned or apologized that the previous doctor had just told someone they had cancer when they didn't. He went on to say that I had a very rare tumor, especially considering the location. I asked if he had ever treated someone with a hemangioblastoma of the spinal cord and he said no. He went on to say that if even one cell was left behind from the tumor that there is always a chance that the tumor could regrow. And that he would continue to monitor the area every six months for regrowth. I was confused because my surgeon was already going to follow that, I was more concerned with the possibility of other tumors and exploring possible explanations for the spinal tumor like VHL. I had told him that earlier this week I had met with my hematologist whom is also a oncologist and he had suggested that radiation would likely be a course of action to make sure it doesn't regrow. The chief oncologist said that he had spoke to radiology and they didn't think that radiation would be beneficial and because this tumor is so rear there is no study that can say that radiation will even be helpful. I asked if he was going to check other areas and organs for tumors and he said no, that I would only have tumors in other places if I had VHL. And I said, so are we going to test for VHL and he said no if no one in your family has it and your not showing any symptoms then you don't have it. Call me stupid, but I thought the hemangioblastoma on my spinal cord was a pretty strong symptom. I said should we be looking else where for other tumors and he said no that if I wasn't showing any symptoms I didn't have any reason to believe that I had a tumor else where. That didn't make sense to me when the tumor I had was actually very large, and had been there for quite some time, however I didn't feel anything until about 3 weeks before I had it removed. I said I didn't understand why we would just sit and wait for something to happen. He responded by saying that every person has a different threshold for playing the waiting game and I will just have to see who strong mine is. And ended by saying that it wouldn't be beneficial for me to know if I had VHL because there is no treatment or cure. That put the topping on the cake. To tell a single person with no children that it wouldn't be beneficial to know is ludicrous to me. This type of diagnosis could be detrimental to how someone plans there future. I should have known that he wasn't going to be able to offer me anything of substance when both doctors I spoke to said that they had to look up the tumor I had before I came in.
So, here is my confusion. First and for most, am I jumping to conclusions to want to be tested for VHL? Is the doctor right and there is no sense in screening for other tumors if I present healthy? Should I see another oncologist, or do you think this will be the typical response? Would it be more beneficial to see a neuro-oncologist. Has radiation been beneficial for anyone else?
Its unfortunate that this has to be considered, but if insurance doesn't cover, how much does this type of genetic test cost.
Thanks for listening, sorry about the long post, but any response would be appreciated. Oh, and thought it might be important to mention that I am a 25 year old female.
Andrea
P.S. has anyone had a hemangioblastoma on there spinal cord?




Add to the discussion