I had some interesting information with a genetic counselor and
geneticist this morning. They recommended that both of my other
children be tested for VHL, even though my husband and I are negative
because of "germline mosaicism." This is how it was explained to me:
Because we have one child who has VHL, and both parents are negative,
Steven's case (our son with VHL) is very likely a new mutation.
However, there is a small, small (4%) chance that Steven got VHL
through germline mosaicism. It is possible that my husband or myself
carry the VHL mutation in sperm or eggs, but that is the only place in
our bodies where the mutation occurs. If Steven got VHL through
germline mosaicism, not new mutation, then the other children also have
a chance of having VHL.
I, like most, have always read or heard that if the parents are
negative there is no reason to test the other children.
Any input on this?
Bangotti
cross-posted JWG




Add to the discussion