Ladies,
I told you I'd ask my gyn-oncologist about the recent address/article by the insensitive British doctor.
He hadn't read it, but when I gave him the gist of it, he shrugged and said, "There's nothing new there. We know the CA125 isn't that great. We know it doesn't increase longevity. We know patients may be addicted to it--what else have they got? But most women don't want to wait to see how big their tumors will get to start treatment, and that's understandable."
In short, his view was that this was nothing new. He didn't seem to think it would make any difference in the way insurance co. covered the tests. I hope I didn't make him seem calloused; he's not. He just had a "Don't let this bother you. We already knew all that," attitude.
Blessings, and hang in there!





Add to the discussion