My oncologist usually goes for the CT with contrast but at my bequest did PETs before and after chemo. It gave me great peace of mind since everything I read indicates it is the best measure of active cancer in the body. But it does involve a greater degree of radiation exposure to the body. I have had 2 PETs, one cardiolite dye/CT heart scan, a upper GI series, a barium swallow xray to check out to see if my lungs were absorbing fluid, 2 panaramic dental xrays, scads of bitewings, 4 or 5 CTs with contrast, and several xrays of my stomach....all between Feb. 08 and presently. That is alot of rads on this body. I now have to have another Ct with contrast so I asked my oncologist what about an MRI instead. She said it would mean I was in there a long time and the Ct is like one cross country flight as far as radiation exposure. Are any of you concerned about this and if so, what do your doctors say about MRI vs CT diagnositically?





Add to the discussion