Osteoporosis drug linked to fractures

1 Recommendation

Osteoporosis drug linked to fractures


Reuters Health

Wednesday, July 9, 2008


NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Prolonged use of Fosamax, also referred to by the generic name bisphosphonate alendronate, may increase the risk of fractures of the femur, the large thigh bone that connects the leg to the hip, according to physicians at the Weill Medical College of Cornell University.

There has been a build-up of evidence suggesting that long-term alendronate use may overly suppress bone metabolism, limiting the repair of microdamage and increasing the risk of fractures, Dr. Joseph M. Lane and colleagues report in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.

To investigate this risk, the New York-based research team reviewed all 70 patients femoral fractures admitted to their Level 1 trauma center between 2002 and 2007. The average patient age was 75 years and the group included 59 women. Records showed that 25 patients (36 percent) were being treated with alendronate.

Nineteen of the 20 patients who had the same fracture pattern were also taking alendronate, the authors report. The other patient was later diagnosed with cancer.

The average duration of alendronate use was significantly longer in patients with femoral stress fractures than in the six treated patients without this type of fracture, 6.9 years versus 2.5 years, respectively.

Otherwise, there were no significant differences in age, race, weight or history of osteoporosis among patients with and those without this fracture pattern, the report indicates.

Lane and his associates call for further research to determine if this effect is associated with all bisphosphonate drugs and if it became apparent first with alendronate because this drug has been available for the longest time and is the most widely used.

In the meantime, "physicians prescribing bisphosphonates for longer durations should monitor patients for indications of bone regeneration," Lane advises in a university press release. If a blood test shows a low level of bone turnover, he recommends that bisphosphonates be discontinued until levels return to normal.

SOURCE: The Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma May/June.


Reuters Health

6 replies

This post mentions "blood test ..... for bone turnover".
Does anyone know what test this is?

Hi PoetLady: I have a bone marker test 3 times a year. These tests can be done on either blood or urine. The two that I know of that test blood is 1. Osteocalcin and 2. BSAP (Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphotase).

I have the 24 hour urine NTx (n-telopeptide). You can also have a 2 hour urine NTx, I've had both.

I have an article in my Fav Links section of my web space here at the NOF, click on my screen name or picture and you can see the Favorite Links at the bottom of the page. It's a Medscape article on bone markers and lists some of the different tests you can have and it also explains that with antiresorptives like Fosomax, Actonel, Boniva, etc., you want your score to go *down* from baseline and if you are taking Forteo the score should go up. If you don't have a baseline test, that's okay, just use the first test as your baseline and compare the following ones to them.

You can also look up bone marker tests or bone turnover tests to see a list of them.

The Medscape article is very good and easy to understand. If you aren't registered there you need to complete a registration to read it. The registration is free and easy to complete and you get a reply in a couple of hours.

Let me know if you can't find my link but it's listed as "Medscape Article on Bone Markers"

PoetLady: I forgot to mention something. The 24 hour urine NTx I mentioned is NOT the same test as the regular 24 hour urine test you might have to check your calcium excretion and other minerals. So if you've had a 24 hour urine test make sure that you aren't confusing the two different types.

Good Luck...

This is kind of scarey I broke my femur while I was taking fosamax. I recently got a reclast infusion. Could this mean more fractures?

Hi Karen: Try to remember that nothing is written in stone, so you may not have a reaction like the one you mentioned. If you read the NEJM article on Reclast it should give the stats on these unusual frax's and how prevelant they are. From whay I've read, the numbers of people with these unusual frax's is still very low compared to the large numbers of people it has helped. The negative press always gets more coverage than the positive, since it's human nature for some to gravitate to the negative.

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/356/18/1809

The above article is very comprehensive and easy to understand on *all* aspects of this drug, pro and con, even though the pro far outweighs the con.

Neil:
Not to mention exercise and movement to increase strength of bone, balance exercises to prevent falls, better body mechanics, etc.
Sara Meeks

Add to the discussion

New user? Join here.
Forgot password?
Keep me signed in on this computer until I sign out

Search

Find information and discussion about health topics in 350,430 posts by members like yourself. Learn more...

Join

Join safe, secure groups sponsored by trusted organizations that care about your health. Learn more...

Connect

Connect with 88,064 members and make friends who share your interests, learn about conditions and treatments, find support and more. Learn more...

You