The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA)
released a new report on Oct. 13, 2009 regarding robotic vs open prostectomy. Anyone considering or facing this option is recommended to research this report. In a nut shell, it basically says that there is no major advantage between robotic vs open surgery. It suggests to do your homework regarding the procedures, the doctor and most important- HOW MANY SURGERIES THE DOCTOR HAS PERFORMED. I was diagnosed in 2007, at age 42 and underwent robotic prostectomy. I happen to be one of the 5% that has major post surgical issues. If I could turn back the clock, I would have researched the risks involved in detail. Despite how urologists downplay the risk factor. Do your homework! This is coming from someone who has experienced the worst possible risks. Intimacy no longer exists and at age 45, might as well have removed the penis too.
Already a member? Sign in
Welcome to Inspire!
What - Inspire is a place where you can connect with people who share your health concerns and find information and advice in groups sponsored by organizations you know and trust.
Why - As a member you can use Inspire to let friends and family know how you're doing, contact others who share your health concerns, receive personalized updates and information about participating in surveys and clinical trials, and more.
How - Joining Inspire is completely free and usually takes less than a minute. Join now!
New JAMA report Oct 13, 2009
- By LAsky26
- Posted October 17, 2009 at 1:56 pm · 23 replies
- Shared with the public
0 Recommendations
