Join now

Already a member? Sign in

Welcome to Inspire!

What - Inspire is a place where you can connect with people who share your health concerns and find information and advice in groups sponsored by organizations you know and trust.

Why - As a member you can use Inspire to let friends and family know how you're doing, contact others who share your health concerns, receive personalized updates and information about participating in surveys and clinical trials, and more.

How - Joining Inspire is completely free and usually takes less than a minute. Join now!

corner corner corner

THE FAST WAY TO STARVE CANCER CELLS

1 Recommendation

Hi Folks !

Under Shanti's post - "Melatonin", some of us got talking about di-urnal fasting as an approach to cancer treatment/prevention. I'd mentioned some members of my integrative cancer support group have successfully applied this approach for upwards of 24+ years ( after 6-12 month prognosis').

For those of you who were interested, I've finally tracked down the original article printed in the Sydney Morning Herald, at:http://members.optusnet.com.au/~maurice.m/herald%20article.html

"THE FAST WAY TO STARVE CANCER CELLS"

Researchers at the University of Sydney believe that limiting your food intake to a six-hour period each day will help prevent and treat disease.

Busy lives, work and family commitments often mean we don't get to sit down to regular main meals but have to eat when we can, at all hours of the day and night, often relying on unhealthy snacks and fast food to keep the hunger pains at bay.

Also better farming methods, refrigeration, canning and preservatives mean food is abundant and we can eat whenever we want.

But could this age of convenience and abundance be killing us? Two Sydney researchers, building on information gathered over the past 50 years, believe "grazing" throughtout the day and night may be also a factor in other diseases such as heart disease, arthritis and asthma.

They have shown in experiments with mice - and preliminary experiments with people - that eating within only six hours a day can boost the body's natural corticosteroid levels, which they say can prevent cancer.

The head of the Department of Infectious Diseases at the University of Sydney, Associate Professor Ray Kearney, said: "What we would suggest here is that a simple cost-free measure of restricted frequency of eating - and the evidence is that it does elevate corticosteroids - can be a health-promoting measure".

Corticosteroids are hormones of the chemical class steroids, and we make them naturally with our adrenal glands in response to day and night, darkness and light, and eating habits.

The hormones have powerful anti-inflammatory effects, and synthetic versions are used to treat diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, emphysema, some allergies, blood disorders and kidney disorders.

The association between chronic inflammation and development of cancer has been recognised for many years.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer estimates that 15 to 20 per cent of human tumours may be related in some way to chronic infection.

For instance, chronic infection with hepatitis B or C is associated with a high risk of liver cancer, and chronic infection with the human papilloma virus is believed to be involved in cervical cancer.

In experiments, Professor Kearney found that mice which had been placed on the restricted-eating regime for six hours and fasted for the next 18 hours resisted a powerful inflammatory agent called 'platelet activating factor' or PAF. The mice not on the regime which were given PAF died quickly.

Taking artificial corticosteroids quickly increases levels in the blood, but prolonged use can suppress the immune system, increase a person's risk of infection, or even be fatal.

Professor Kearney and a PHD student, Gavin Greenoak, who has done experiments based on Professor Kearney's work, say boosting our natural levels of corticosteroids is risk-free and highly desirable.

Professor Kearney said: "Taking synthetic corticosteroids is out of the body's natural balance. This is about optimising the body's natural steroid levels, making the peaks higher and the troughs not as low.

"We would argue that in most people the levels are sub-optimal."

Gavin Greenoak found that allowing mice to feed for only six hours a day, compared with "grazing" whenever they liked over 24 hours, reduced the incidence of skin cancer - a classic model for understanding mechanismsof cancer development - by 93 per cent.

The two groups of mice were exposed to simulated natural sunlight for certain periods, known to give them cancer 100 per cent of the time.

Both groups could eat as much as they wanted, and in fact the ones that could eat for only six hours a day managed to eat as much as the ones that were allowed to eat all the time.

The mice that could eat at will developed 259 tumours, compared with the mice that could eat only within the restricted period, which developed 19 tumours.

Gavin Greenoak's experiment found, as did professor Kearney's earlier ones, that the control-fed animals had an increase in corticosteroid levels.

Not only do these hormones help protect against cancer by reducing inflammation, they slso stop a process needed for cancer to gain a foothold. They interfere with the creation of blood vessles called angiogenesis.

Studies show that all agents or conditions interfering with this process also interefere with tumour growth, because tumours need to form blood vessels to grow.

The process is also needed for parts of the tumour to break off and form elsewhere (metastasis).

It is needed for the development of other disease states, including atherosclerotic plaque in heart arteries, arthritis, a number of eye diseases and delayed wound healing.

So eating within only six hours a day and fasting for the other 18 may not only increase your resistance to cancer but also protect you against certain heart diseases, damage caused by artthritis and other problems.

In preliminary experiments with humans, which have yet to be published, professor Kearney and GavinjGreenoak found "to our astonishment" that eating within six hours a day caused "significant" rises in corticosteroid levels.

The women responded better than the men, which Professor kearney said mirrors nature where females are more sensitive to changes in their environment for biological reasons

In the experiments, the people - who were first-year medical students at Sydney University - could eat whatever they liked within six hours, but outside that they could only eat high-fibre, low calorie foods such as bran or muesli, fruit an salads (but not high-fat fruit such as avocadoes or nuts).

Drinks were not restricted, although they were warned that alcohol was high-calorie, so several drinks would affect corticosteroid levels.

Their corsticosteroid levels were measured using a saliva test which was independently analysed by Associate Professor Jack Bassett at Macquarie University.

Eating whenever we want seems to be the norm these days, made possible by the development of the refrigeration, cans and preservatives.

Fasting has fallen into disregard in the eyes of orthodox practitioners for healing and preventative purposes with the advent of modern drug-oriented medicine.

People who fast or recommend it are often seen as health-freaks or quacks. But periodic fasts make sense in terms of what we would have been adapted to "in the wild" - primitive man would have had to contend with temporary or seasonal food shortages. It's also known that animals fast when sick.

In fact, fasting has been used throughout history for healing, purification and rejuvination purposes. The benefits are well documented by clinical experience in Europe, particularly in Sweden and Germany and also the United States.

Most Eastern philosophers and super-yogis fast regularly to prolong life and increase spiritual awareness

Eating within certain hours also comes natuarally to some. Mediterranean people eat the majority of their food within six hours, stopping work for a siesta between about midday and 5 or 6 pm to eat their main meal of the day and rest.

Greenoak said a farming community in Europe read of his experimentsand wrote to tell him that they ate only two main meals a day and enjoyed extraordinary good health. There are also times of forced fasting sauch as during wars.

Several studies show cancer rates fell considerably during World War1, when there were food shortages and general under-nutrition.

A study looking at cancer deaths in Germany from 1905 to 1930 found significantly fewer deaths from cancer from 1915 to 1920.

After World War 1 the upward trend of increasing cancer deaths continued. In the town of Graz in Austria, there was a 25-year low in cancer deaths in 1918 and the rate tended to remain low until 1924, when it showed a definite upward trend. The food shortage developed later and lasted longer in Graz than other parts of Austria and in Germany.
• Exercise may also be a factor in the mice and the humans - resisting cancer.
• Age may also be a factor.
In these experiments the animals were fairly young and responded quickly to the change in eating patterns, and animals that had been on an unrestricted diet for a long time took longer to respond.

The findings of Professor Keaney and Greenoak will be presented at the World Cancer Congress on alternative cancer treatments and prevention in Sydney from April 16-18, and at a congress on breast cancer in Brugge, Belgium, on April 21-22, organised by the British medical journal The Lancet.

Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
Publication Date: 12-4-94
........................................................................... ...................

Interesting concept, and I must admit the two 'elderly' men I know who practice this (religiously!), along with other CAM therapies, have defied their doctor's "death guesses" by many years.

Cheers, xxxGGC

8 replies

Hey Heather, Good info. I've read this 6 hour window in other nutitional research articles and plans too. Makes me think there is really something to it.

While reading your post I was reminded of some initial research I read that came from Valtar Longo, Ph.D. at U of California-Davis. It's related to fasting and timing of chemo. I found one of the articles and will paste it here. Anyone interested in following it further can just google the author for more up to date info

Lab Report
New Way to Fight Cancer
USC biologists discover a way to protect non-cancer cells from destructive force of chemotherapy.
By Carl Marziali
Autumn 2008

Valter Longo, Ph.D., associate professor at the USC Davis School of Gerontology.
In the fight against cancer, calling in the heavy artillery of high dose-chemotherapy can be deadly to rogue cancer cells—and to law-abiding normal cells too. If only some Star Trek-type force field could protect the normal cells from toxic effects of chemotherapy, higher doses or more frequent treatment could be used.

A USC research study suggests a simpler alternative. The study, which appeared online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Early Edition, found that fasting for two days protects healthy cells against chemotherapy.

Mice given a high dose of chemotherapy after fasting continued to thrive. The same dose killed half the normally fed mice and caused lasting weight and energy loss in the survivors.

The chemotherapy worked as intended on the cancer, extending the lifespan of mice injected with aggressive human tumors, reported the group led by Valter Longo, Ph.D., associate professor at the USC Davis School of Gerontology. He has joint appointments as associate professor of biological sciences at USC College and in the USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Keck School of Medicine.

Longo says that the idea of protecting healthy cells from chemotherapy “had to come from the anti-aging field because that’s what we focus on: protecting all cells at once.”

About five years ago, Longo was thinking about the genetic pathways involved both in the starvation response and in mammalian tumors. When the pathways are silenced, starved cells go into what Longo calls a maintenance mode characterized by extreme resistance to stresses.

But tumors by definition disobey orders to stop growing because the same genetic pathways are stuck in an “on” mode.

During the study, conducted both at USC and in the laboratory of Lizzia Raffaghello, Ph.D., at Gaslini Children’s Hospital in Genoa, Italy, the researchers found that current chemotherapy drugs kill as many healthy mammalian cells as cancer cells.

But after subjecting the cells to fasting, the research team “reached a two- to five-fold difference between normal and cancer cells, including human cells in culture. More importantly, we consistently showed that (normal cells in) mice were highly protected while cancer cells remained sensitive,” Longo says.

Looking ahead, Longo says they need to spend a lot of time talking to clinical oncologists to decide how best to proceed in human studies. Fasting before chemotherapy has unknown risks for humans, he cautions. Only clinical trials can establish the effectiveness and safety of fasting before chemotherapy.

This is very interesting information. I wonder what the exact foods are that you can eat after the six hour period in case of hunger. I could see myself being busy and not eating enough in the 6 hour window and then being hungry later. Most of the time I think I could do it pretty easily. It is really just eating two meals a day.

Thanks for giving me another tool to explore.

Thanks for the info Groovygirlcool!!! I am doing chemo right now and can't imagine going 18 hours without food,
I would pass out.....out of my league.

Hi Girls -
As mentioned in the article, and what I know from the people who adhere to the this regime, it involves eating what you like for the six hour period - say 7am to 1 pm or midday to 6 pm, for example.

Outside these times having only a vegetable based soup (perhaps with tomato/celery/onion/carrot/garlic/chilli) or salad,eg. lettuce/cucumber/tomato/carrot/capsicum(bell pepper)/celery/etc for the evening

And for mornings possibly fruit salad with apple/watermelon/rockmelon(cantalope?)/pineapple/orange/strawberries/bluebe rries, etc or a juice based on these or any other lower calorie fruits and vegetables.

From my life-long 'career' as a intermittently successful weight watcher- I'd say avoid bananas, grapes,mangoes,avocadoes,corn,potatoes,beans - anything starchy or high in natural sugar, for the 18 hour period.

I did try this briefly in 2007, having a normal cereal/fruit/rice milk breakfast, then morning tea(if hungry), followed by a substantial lunch (two nori maki "sushi" rolls/miso soup for me or salmon salad sandwich + fruit,etc). Then I'd just have homemade tomato based vege soup in the evening or a big green salad if out for dinner with friends - socialising is tough!

Mena, I think chemo would be hard enough without any more challenges to take on!! Eat what you can, when you can!

xxxGGC

Thanks

I appreciate your feedback and encouragement. I try to eat as healthy as poss though!!!!

Cheers

Being one that has a tough time eating before noon, this might e a good and easy thing for me to try except my onc wants me to gain another 10 pounds so I'm back to where I was before the mets hit. I don't want the extra weight but he says it will be safer for me in case I go into another episode of vomiting like I did last winter.

I did chemo yesterday and have been told that a good high protein meal or two just before chemo is what I should be doing, now this article says to fast before chemo? Hmmm...

The more we learn, the less we know but many studies indicate that eating less helps one live longer. Up to 30% less!

Thanks for the info. It's a very interesting concept that I'm going to look into further.

Might be worth a try. Certainly sounds harmless enough with some results!

Add to the discussion

Don't have an Inspire account? Join now!

Forgot password?

Group leaders

You