The Inspire Q&A: Inspire talks with Kevin Pho, MD

Dear Inspire Community Members,

We at Inspire are pleased to bring you the latest in a series of Q&A interviews with people we feel are making contributions to helping patients worldwide. We are posting these interviews in a Q&A format in my Journal as a news feature for members of all communities on Inspire.

I recently interviewed Kevin Pho, known widely as the blogger KevinMD. Pho is a member of USA Today’s Board of Contributors. He writes and speaks on topics related to healthcare social media, and his opinion pieces appear in publications such as USA Today, CNN.com, and the New York Times. Pho received his medical degree and completed residency at Boston University School of Medicine. He is board certified in internal medicine and practices primary care in Nashua, NH.

Inspire: Do you think it’s the norm now for patients bringing printouts of health news or information from the Internet to their physicians and expect to talk about those printouts?

Pho: I can say that in general patients are using the Web more to empower themselves. Information now flows two ways. Before, healthcare used to be a more hierarchical, one-way transfer of information, but now, with the power of the Web, more patients are going online and empowering themselves to become better-educated patients.

Inspire: From your perspective, what is the impact of that shift?

Pho: I’ll be honest. Not everyone in the medical profession is happy with that. But whenever I cross the country and tell doctors about this phenomenon, I let them know it’s happening anyway, and we might as well embrace it. The longer it takes for us to embrace it, the bigger the disconnect that we’re going to have with patients, and that’s going to make our jobs harder in the exam room in the end.

Inspire: When you have conversations with fellow physicians who have legitimate criticisms of patients becoming more active in their own treatment, particularly by researching online, how do those conversations usually go?

Pho: I always say, “If patients aren’t going to come to you looking to help interpret health information, they’re going to look elsewhere. They’re going to look further on the Web.” There was a study earlier this year that only 25% of patients going on the Web looking for health information actually checked the source of that information. So I think, as medical professionals it’s our responsibility to interpret what patients find on the Web, make sure it is medically sound, and help them translate it and help patients apply that information to themselves.

Inspire: To be so active and entrenched in healthcare social media probably makes you think sometimes that it is very widespread, but studies show that it’s not widespread yet.

Pho: If you look at social media as it relates to healthcare, just last year the American Medical Association came up with professional guidelines, and hospitals are just now embracing social media and recognizing it as a viable forum to communicate real-time information to patients. And I think in the medical profession we’re still a step behind, so one of my goals when I travel across the country is to convince doctors of the value of social media and to let them know it’s here to stay. So, if I were to use one word, it would be that healthcare social media is in its infancy still.

Inspire: How would you define the term “empowered patient?”

Pho: I would say it would be a patient who is an active participant in their healthcare, and wants to play an active role in the shared decision about their health. I think there are some doctors who fear empowered patients and think that it’s infringing on the traditional doctor-patient relationship. But I think the trend is toward more shared decision-making and having patients being partners in their healthcare. And I think it’s to a physician’s benefit that they recognize that phenomenon.

Inspire: What qualities do effective “e-patients” share?

Pho: I think they’re proactive in their healthcare. They’re inquisitive. They like to ask questions. And they don’t always take what doctors say as the final word. As physicians, we don’t know all the answers. There are a lot of studies that get contradicted. There’s a lot of new information that comes out, and I’ll be honest, there are a lot of things doctors don’t know. So, I think it’s certainly our responsibility to keep up with that information, but patients have a responsibility too to take control of their healthcare and be that partner that really is the epitome of an ideal doctor-patient relationship.

Inspire: You touched there on the responsibility of patients. There’s often discussions about the levels of responsibility that patients should assume in this new paradigm, and the classic tale about patients who don’t follow the agreed-upon treatment protocol, such as diet and exercise, and who then blames the physician for poor health outcomes. How might social media help in improving that hoped-for shared outcome?

Pho: I think it breaks down barriers between doctors and patients. Social media introduces that transparency that was lacking before. Now, whenever I write in my blog, behind the proverbial curtain, patients have a better idea of some of the things physicians are facing. They can understand why we sometimes run an hour late, why we can only spend five to 10 minutes with patients, why we do some of the more unpleasant things that we do. And I think, on the other hand, through social media, doctors can hear from patients as well. Whether it’s comments on my blog, and sometimes I invite patients to write a guest post because I think it’s important for doctors to hear the stories from patients too. A lot of doctors haven’t gone through personally what their patients are going through, so I think it’s important for each party to share that experience, whether it’s a blog, or on Twitter, or Facebook, or on groups like Inspire, I think it’s important that each party hears each other’s perspectives.

Inspire: People are using Yelp and Angie’s List and online customer rating services like those more regularly. Do you see patient-driven online physician rating and hospital rating services becoming more popular?

Pho: Let me take a step back on this, and talk about online physician rating sites in general. I wrote about this topic recently. I get a lot of stories from doctors saying patients wrote negatives reviews about them online, and they want to know what they can do about it. The first thing I tell them is it’s here to stay. Patients want a way, like TripAdvisor, like Yelp, they want a way to know from other people what it’s like to go to a certain doctor or hospital. And, the most convenient user-friendly way to do today are online rating sites. I do think there are some problems with those things.

Inspire: Such as?

Pho: First, a lot of them are anonymous. Some of them don’t allow doctors and hospitals to respond, and frankly, also, not enough patients use them, so a lot of those reviews are skewed. I think the sites can tremendous useful for doctors to receive that kind of feedback and frankly, there are some doctors who need to hear that type of feedback. So, what I tell doctors is that they need to encourage more of their patients to rate them online. There was an article I always cite, that was in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, that showed close to 90% of patient ratings of doctors online are actually positive. So, if you get more and more patients rating doctors online, chances are they’re going to be better what doctors think, because it’s going to present a more accurate picture of what a doctor is like, and some of those outlier negative ratings will just be considered as such.

Inspire: Let me return to the topic of the patient-physician relationship with regard to patient empowerment. When a patient begins an appointment with you saying that she read something online about her health, where does the conversation usually go from there?

Pho: Every conversation is unique, but I always try to let the patient lead and let the patient take charge as to where he or she wants to go with that information. I always ask them what they read online and what they think about it, and if there are any medical inaccuracies I’d certainly give my take on it. And I never discourage patients from researching online. I realize that telling patients to not go online for health information is not a viable option. I’ll give patients tips as to what are reputable sites, to be careful as to what someone is saying on blogs, as they may not be as accurate as a hospital-based or government-based Web site. Certainly everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so if a patient draws a different opinion than I do from an article, I will certainly give my take, but in the end it’s the patient’s ultimate choice as to where they want to take their medical care. I’m here as a guide, and I’m here as a resource.

Inspire: It can’t be easy, particularly in the US system that you work in, to devote enough time to have substantive discussions with patients who bring some amount of online research to appointments.

Pho: It does take time, and the way that doctors are financially incentivized, and the way that our medical system is built is based on 10- to 15-minute office visits, and really is not meant for long conversations. And that’s a shame, and I hope that will change in the next five to 10 years. What I always tell patients is to prioritize their questions and concerns. I think that patients understand that there are cases where I’m not going to be able to address all of their concerns in a single office visit, and there are some issues that deserve their own office visit. Rather than give a rushed version, it’s better to have patients come back and give the issue the time it deserves.

(Please email me at john@inspire.com if you have suggestions for future Inspire Q&As. Feel free to post comments to this interview, and thanks for reading.)

Edited May 8, 2011 at 9:46 pm

58 replies   

Very interesting. I am a regular reader of KevinMD, and appreciate his great contribution to this area. It is good for doctors to be able to share their concerns, and also to hear from patients, and for patients to hear from doctors. As Kevin says here, it is growing into a partnership that I believe will be important, not only for patients, but also for doctors. Each of us needs to respect the opinions and needs of the other.

Thanks, John.

Best wishes,
Joyce

Great interview, John! Insightful comments from Dr. Pho (as usual). I particularly appreciate his articulation of social media in healthcare as a two-way street in terms of communication (with opportunities and responsibilities in both directions). While I understand some of the trepidation and reticence on the part of healthcare when it comes to social media and patient empowerment, I agree with Kevin that it’s not going away, so providers “might as well embrace it.” Indeed, they can complain to no avail, or grab the bull by the horns and capitalize on the opportunity.

This trend presents healthcare providers and institutions with a great way to position themselves as the go-to source for reliable health info in their community. In so doing, they can build a relationship with patients and prospective patients that’s based on education, support and trust. And that will bear fruit business-wise when those people need medical care.

– Bill Lindsay, Content Curator, UbiCare.com

Realizing that there are at least two sides to just about every issue and that more of us are equipped with portable electronic info sources, why don't more Drs embrace this and provide sites for us that would be helpful. Most things, such as this site, I have found on my own.

Hello Dr. Pho, and thank you for your words here!
As an encephalitis survivor (1999), I've been sharing information and support on the topic of encephalitis for more than 10 years. It is an extremely delicate two-step for a non-medical to be acknowledged as an asset in assisting people touched by such a serious illness.
The medical professionals involved with my case were excellent. I was swiftly diagnosed and well cared for in hospital. Once I was home, however, the medical professionals had moved on to perform miracles on the next patient, and my family was lost on how to proceed with me.
I'm now President of Encephalitis Global Inc., www.encephalitisglobal.org a USA non-profit organization and website which shares information and support with encephalitis survivors, caregivers and loved ones. Through Inspire, we exchange more than 300 messages/postings each month, answering questions and helping people in North America and around the world.
In the United Kingdom, The Encephalitis Society (www.encephalitis.info) started out in a similar fashion, and now is a vibrant group of medical professionals and support people, offering full service assistance to people in need.
Encephalitis Global does strive to be professionally recognized as an asset to the medical community here in North America.

Dear John, and Dr. Pho,
I really enjoyed the exchange of ideas on this topic, and also appreciated having the perspective of a physician caught between the needs of the patient, and the constraints of today's current medical practices.

Medical 'care' has been compromised by our insurance companies, and profit seeking corporations. For the most part, no one can "treat" a patient in 5-15 minutes, nor should they even try. Yet we expect our doctors to do this every day, and then are disappointed or enraged when something is missed, or incorrect, or goes terribly awry.

I think we have come to a place where the patient has to be their own advocate, and yet few have any training in this area. But when you get a diagnosis of a serious disease, the patient is usually too shell shocked to even absorb anything said after the name of the condition. So what do you do? Go home, go online, type in whatever you recall, and try to take some control back in your life.

If doctor's understand this very human, and proactive response to disaster, then perhaps providing guidance with helpful and reliable sources to research on the internet would be a great way to honor their patient's intelligence. I see my doctor as my partner in my care. It is not always easy to strike this balance. But if this is important to you, then finding a doctor who respects your concerns and is willing to work with you is essential.

Thank you again for providing this thought provoking forum.
Peg

Wonderful discussion post John. I've just subscribed to Kevin Pho's blog. I'm also recommending another excellent blog site:
http://www.drjohnm.org/about-drjohnm3/ (cardiac electrophysiologist) whose essays are excellent teaching instruments for patients too. These two physicians are unafraid of technology, computers, social networks...which in turn will be rapidly affecting the speed and effiency and ACCURACY of medical practice.

Good to see Dr. Pho's blog link to 'Guide to Biostatistics'. As I understand it, IBM's Watson is being utilized in this fashion now to help medical patient megadata trends guide treatment. A refreshing 21st century momentum!! Working on computers since 1988 (NASA, Particle accelerator facility) in high energy physics environment, it was a no-brainer for me to seek on-line info. I had to. My medical events left me too weakened and emotional to 'snap out of it and robotically report symptoms' in a 10 minute encounter. Cardiac conditions are far too complex (and deeply emotional) for any physician to take on in 10 minutes. Patients need to be able to carefully read and absorb information at their own pace. The education pace is organic, exponential. Lots of processing must take place. Doctors are allowed to pluck symptoms to treat....the patient must live within the entire context of his/her life which doesn't change because the 10 minutes are up. As a female, I was mostly talked over within minutes.

I have never taken internet references to an appointment. But I quickly learned I would need to carry hard copies of my heart attack angioplasty hospital records (age 41) to ALL my doctors. This preempts the 'oh, come on...did you have a real heart attack?" I hand over the first 4 pages and wait as the doctors' attitude does a 180. Outcomes are safer and more productive for me once this shift has occurred. Coming from the perspective of a career in hard sciences, it is disheartening how breathtakingly backward most of my physician encounters continue to be. Collecting medical records for 20 years also outed shockingly gender biased, utterly subjective comments.

My concern about Dr. Pho's stance on 'defensive medicine' is that it is already so difficult for younger women to be sent for cardiac testing of any kind that a trend to cut back will inevitably start with the female gender. I had full coverage excellent insurance but that had nothing to do with the accuracy of diagoses and gave doctors the options of barring me from any kind of cardiac referrals/testing. This nearly cost me my life. I had no idea any of this was going on at those times. Young, busy, clueless.

Because of this and for-profit doctor-patient conflicts of interest, the internet goes a long way towards helping patients bone up and decide what options are affordable. On the cardiac front, I'm still waiting for something more ethical than 'we need to cut back on unnecessary testing....decided after the fact.'

One final comment. Let's not assume patients are getting their on-line/social media information from Farmville. I have privileges at EVMS library which means access to all medical journals, publications, texts. My best friend is a neuropsych. Amazon also offers a terrific 'buy back' for medical school/ethics textbooks where I purchased $500 manuals for under $25 each. OpenCourses.org is also offering free access to medical class courses/lectures/syllibi/tests (Stanford, MIT, etc) for anyone to learn. No course credits of course, but this is a sign of growing transparency and healthy community outreach! All accredited schools & info.

I could care less what they did with expendible organs....But heart damage? That imploded my life at a young age. Without internet I would have rambled forever in a giant info vacuum. It wasn't until Dr. Noel Beiry-Merz recommended the Inspire WomenHeart. org site that I stumbled gratefully into a huge learning curve. The chronic nature of heart damage requires serious time and help. I will always experience the brusque treatment in CIC and few followups where my comments were dismissed as inhumane. Internet searching may be the only infrastructure life line female heart patients can get to.

The great information divide is is closing by the nano-second. Anything that can further protect vulnerable patients is a good thing.

Jaynie

Dear John & Dr. Pho,

I agree with much of what was stated in the article and in the comments on this forum posting.

Indeed, the "ratings" issue along with all of social media is here to stay and in my mind it will change the doctor/patient relationship ongoing but in a good way.

The physicians who want to play the role of "God" will instantly take a step back to those that are willing to acknowledge the patient as a true partner in the healing process. It will make for better discussion, better treatment and better outcome.

However, all of this is not new. So many doctors out there are already very patient-oriented and embrace that relationship. It is the patient behavior that is changing in this dynamic. And in response that doctor is "book smart" and "clinically smart" but also "patient smart." He/She can really drive the patient's ability to change lifestyle in this manner. This is why you see "The Doctors" and other similar TV shows becoming so popular, because it makes healthcare goals appear less scary and provide useful and alternative ways to get to those goals other than "just do it." Our universe loves Twitter and honestly the more concise and entertaining we can be, the more likely the patient will listen.

Great job!

Respectfully,
Deb Discenza
Co-Author of "The Preemie Parent's Survival Guide to the NICU"
Co-Founder, PreemieWorld (www.PreemieWorld.com)
Founder and Former Publisher of Preemie Magazine

my doc is open to things I bring, but she does say often materials folks bring to the office are off the mark and can take up more time during the visit.
she has indicated what is most helpful are patients who know their meds, who bring their questions written down, who have new problems noted, when they started, the symptoms and how the symptoms impact their life. Maybe what they have tried for them, what makes them worse, what improves them.

she likes patients to come in when major things happen, rather than try to deal with them over the phone, she sees the need for exams when there is a new problem. Makes sense, as things can be missed over the phone

Wonderful interview. Thank you Dr. Pho and John. I am going to forward this to some friends I have that are doctors. They say the same thing that we as patients need to stay off the internet. I disagree. The internet is a wonderful tool that has empowered me to understand my bladder cancer. It helped me find the right doctor and the right facility for me. It helped me know that my treatment plan is the right one for me.

Thank you so much John and Dr. Kevin for this insightful interview.

I'm one of the people who have been asked to write guest posts on KevinMD about heart disease issues from a patient's perspective. Reading posts on KevinMD (and particularly the lively debate going on afterwards in the comments responding to the posts!) gives patients a unique insider's look at the wonderful world of health care professionals.

Recently, for example, these debates range from why docs should be on Facebook (or NOT!), why nurse practitioners are a poor substitute for "real" medical care, why depression doesn't get diagnosed (because there's no money to be made in diagnosing your depression, apparently!) and physicians' general distress over earning a living in the face of growing bureaucratic costs and shrinking insurance payments.

Dr. K also briefly mentions: "I’ll give patients tips as to what are reputable sites." This deserves far wider attention than one sentence. If docs don't want patients trusting junk science from celebrity doctors online who are flogging their own miracle supplements and questionable advice, please give patients a written list of credible, independent web resources and pro-actively steer all patients there. Better yet, post this list of your favourites online and in your waiting rooms.

Whether or not patients should research their medical conditions online is a moot point. As Dr. Kevin wisely says: "It’s to a physician’s benefit that they recognize that phenomenon." WE'RE ALREADY DOING IT!

Why? Like Jaynie, I too was misdiagnosed and sent home in mid-heart attack by an E.R. doc (despite presenting with textbook MI symptoms like crushing chest pain, nausea, sweating and pain radiating down my left arm).

Too bad this guy hadn't Googled my symptoms while I was lying there, because Google would have done a better job guessing at the correct diagnosis than he did!

Sadly, our experiences are tragically common in women. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reported, in fact, that women heart patients under age 55 are SEVEN TIMES more likely to be misdiagnosed in the E.R. in mid-heart attack than men of the same age. So can you blame any of us for wanting to arm ourselves with solid knowledge about our own bodies considering this reality? As my own cardiologist told me last week: "You live with this 24/7 - I don't."

I'd also like to put in a good word for these Inspire sites, like our WomenHeart online community here. The reality is that these forums are far more helpful for many of us than what we're getting from our doctors. Wendy's encephalitis site is another example of how support and information from the very people who are walking the talk can be as useful (and in some cases, MORE useful) than what we are able to learn in our doctors' office.

This is a practice-altering sea change for the medical profession. A short generation ago, patients had only their own physicians to rely on for medical advice (unless you spent hours at your local university's medical library sweating over unintelligibly complicated textbooks, taking copious notes!) Doctors rarely if ever had to deal with a patient asking challenging questions about diagnoses or treatment options that they'd heard of from other patients or other sources. For many docs, those were the 'good old days' I guess.... ;-)

Thanks once again....

Carolyn Thomas

www.myheartsisters.org

Great article. I was recently diagnosed with a trigeminal nerve injury. A doctor gave me a paper with instructions for TMJ and sent me along my merry way. What did he think I was going to do? I did my own research (online) and learned as much as I could. When I went back, I was an informed patient with questions he had to answer, and the biggest one was "Why did you give me information on TMJ when I have a nerve injury?" Of course, it put him on the defense, but so what? I need a doctor who is willing to give me the information I need to make good decisions on my healthcare, or at least explain why he's giving me advice that doesn't seem related. Doctors need to realize the internet isn't going to go away and find a way to steer their patients toward the sites that will give accurate information at a level the PATIENT can understand.

I already rate hotels, restaurants, consumer products and services online-- and anonymously. A doctor has a service to offer, and I will rate that service as well. Of course, I am only one person, and everyone else can rate their experience too. I believe I am a savvy enough consumer to read reviews with a grain of salt and determine if a review or overall rating should be trusted. I sure wish I had doctor reviews available to me before I had the nerve damage!

Thank you for a great interview

When I was researching proton therapy for my prostate cancer, I found most all docs to be virtually ignorant of what it was, and how it worked. I found the greatest help from folks I hooked up with on the net, including physicians who had chosen that modality for themselves. For me, I found too many docs to be dismissive based not on knowledge, but a lack of it. Bottom line is I appreciate the freshness of this approach.

Thank you Inspire for this interview and thank you Inspire collaborators for your comments. As a Nurse Practitioner, I am always reading from what physicians call "the mid-level provider" perspective and try to limit my observations and comments to things that I honestly see medically pertinent. I try to read things here on Insight and to provide feedback that is sound and to raise alarms when I see something that is critically inadvisable. I'm probably not always successful in this as it's hard to separate the clinician from the patient when it's your OWN problem.

Yes, the internet is here to stay and it does help us to be more informed and to bring info to our docs and Kevin is right: it is here to stay so we all need to learn how to live with it and how to use it to our advantage-as patients and as clinicians.

I have finally assembled my own 'team' and have a wonderful caddry of providers who 'listen' and 'suggest' and who welcome collaboration. But I didn't get here by accident. I've had a number of physicians who didn't want to do it that way. They now are minus one patient. It's not as hard to move on as we think it will be. And the rewards are soooooooooooo great!

Thank you for sharing this interview. I am one of those patients who comes armed to my appointment with questions and sometimes information from the Internet. I try to utilize only the top cancer sites like Mayo Clinic, MD Anderson, American Cancer Society, etc.

We, as patients have a right and responsibility to help the doctors help us with our illness, no matter what it is. After all, it is our lives that is at stake!

Stay strong!

Angel

Thank you for allowing us to get an inside look at how doctors feel about the empowered patients of today. Being a TT patient, I am most glad to have the opportunity to be able to research my condition by way of the web. If I had not had this choice, I would still be suffering today. We as thyroid patients have been treated with inadequate, and inferior medical treatment. We have had our thyroids snatched, and put out into the world with very little information as to where to go from there. We have been put on medicines according to lab numbers, while still suffering, and having no one to listen to us. It is only through my becoming empowered, through reading, and the web, that I have been able to choose the treatment that is best suited for me. It is almost criminal how little doctors know about how to treat this area of the body. An area of the body that is so in control of our every system. An area that determines, whether we live or die. I have learned more from patient advocates, who have suffered, and found an answer, than a doctor. I am happy for the WEB.

Thank you for the insightful and well thought out interview. As a parent with a daughter who was getting increasingly sicker, and doctors who failed to help or apparently care, I found that her mystery illness was most likely Lyme disease from a tick bite months before (previously undiagnosed despite telltale symptoms). Had it not been for the internet she would not have even been diagnosed correctly. Yet, I was told by the Chief of Infectious Disease in our state that I should stay off the internet! What? The information I found online saved her life!

Thanks for the interview. I go on-line to educate myself and then often will email questions to my doctor's (I have several specialist) with questions and will dialog via emails before appointments! I have never been disrespected by any of my doctors for using the internet to become more knowledgeable about my complex medical conditions.

It is important that patients are proactive and actively participate in the decision making process of their care care as much as possible. this will benefit them and help their caretakers, prervent errors, and prevent misunderstanding. Although I am an experienced physician, it was an entirely new and challenging experience to face cancer as a patient rather than as a physician. I learned these lessons as a patient.

Itzhak Brook MD
WebSite: http://dribrook.blogspot.com/

I have been fighting breast cancer since l990 and have never been without treatment since then. The BC became mets to the bones 4 yrs. ago and reciently found out that the mets are also in the liver and lympnodes under the pancreas, Presently on Pain patch fentanyl l25, oxicodon as needed, as well as meds for neausea.. also on xgevia for bones and chemo (doxil) .... I see my oncologist regularly and get my chemo as scheduled... However I feel that if I didn't have a positive attitude I might not still be here...... I agree whole heartedly that a positive atitude is equally as important as your meds and care is..... I love to read spiritual materials because it gives me a burst of energy..... I especially love to read books written by Dr. Bernie Siegel.....Thank you everyone for your encourageing words of wisdom........ LIVE, LOVE, AND LAUGH...........





I

This journal entry is closed to replies. We close all journal entries after 90 days.

If there's something you'd like to say, here are some things you can do:

Things you can do